检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省安康医院强制戒毒所,济宁272051 [2]山东省枣庄矿业集团东郊医院,枣庄277119
出 处:《中国药物依赖性杂志》2009年第5期446-450,共5页Chinese Journal of Drug Dependence
摘 要:目的:探讨循证护理在戒毒工作中的应用效果,为戒毒者的康复寻求科学有效的护理措施。方法:将120例戒毒者随机分为研究组和对照组,各60例,研究组实施为期8周的循证护理,对照组实施普通护理。采用护士用住院患者观察量表(NOSIE)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)以及住院精神病人康复疗效评定量表(IPROS)进行临床效果评价。结果:干预前,NOSIE,SCL-90,IPROS量表评分,两组比较差异无显著性(P均>0.05),干预后,NOSIE,SCL-90,IPROS各量表评分,研究组明显好于对照组,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.001)。结论:在戒毒者的康复护理中,纳入循证护理能使临床护理活动完善,能使戒毒者得到更好的康复。Objective.: To explore the efficacy of evidence - based nursing (EBN) in drug rehabilitation and look for scientific and effective nursing method for patients on drug rehabilitation. Methods:One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into study group (n = 60) and control group(n =60). Study group was treated with EBN for 8 weeks, and control group treated with routine nursing. The clinical effect was evaluated by Nurses Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation( NOSIE), Symptom Checklist 90 ( SCL - 90 ) and Inpatient Psychiatric Rehabilitation Outcome Scale ( IPROS ). Results : Compared with control group, study group showed no difference in SCL -90 and IPROS( P 均 〉 0. 05 ) before intervention, while after intervention, study group indicated significant difference in NOSIE, SCL - 90 and IPROS ( P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusion : Using EBN in drug rehabilitation can improve clinical nursing, and help patients obtaining better rehabilitation.
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R47[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.178