检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李章海[1] 王能如[1] 王东胜[1] 朱显灵[1] 周慧玲[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科技大学烟草与健康研究中心,合肥230051
出 处:《中国烟草科学》2009年第5期67-70,76,共5页Chinese Tobacco Science
基 金:黔南烟草专卖局科技项目[黔南科发(2008)32号];广西自治区烟草专卖局[桂烟科(2006)1号]
摘 要:采用烟叶香型指数的方法,研究了我国5个不同生态尺度烟区烤烟香型风格及相关香气成分的变化。结果表明,云南大理和福建三明的烤烟为"清香型"风格,但二者之间香型指数差异明显;贵州黔南和广西河池烤烟为"中间香型"风格;河南南阳烤烟为"浓香型"风格。生态条件差异大是影响烟叶香型风格的主导因素,在同一烤烟产区不同产烟县,生态条件差异较小对相关香气成分有影响,但不会改变烟叶的香型风格。The changes of aroma type styles and related aroma constituents of five different ecological scale regions of flue-cured tobacco production in China were studied with tobacco leaf aroma index approach. The results showed that the flue-cured tobacco leaves from Dali, Yunnan and Sanming, Fujian were both faint aroma type, though their aroma indices varied significantly, while the leaves from Qiannan, Guizhou and Hechi, Guangxi were both neutral aroma type, the leaves from Nanyang, Henan was full aroma type. The large ecological differences among various regions were the leading factors that influenced leaf aroma type style. The small differences among various counties in one production region would change related aroma constituents of leaves, but not the styles of aroma type.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222