检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王文辉[1] 蒲怀智[1] 雷小林[1] 汪宏云[1] 高泽莉[1]
机构地区:[1]攀枝花学院附属医院肿瘤科,四川攀枝花617000
出 处:《肿瘤预防与治疗》2009年第4期395-397,共3页Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment
摘 要:目的:探讨深部热疗结合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法:将65例经病理学或细胞学确诊的Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期不能手术的NSCLC患者按随机表分配法分成两组:热化组(33例)和单化组(32例),比较两组疗效及毒副反应。结果:单化组,总有效率(CR+PR)为37.50%(12/32),中位疾病进展时间(TP)6.5个月,中位生存时间9.5个月,1年生存率53.6%;热化组,总有效率(CR+PR)为 63.70%(21/33),中位疾病进展时间(TTP) 9. 6个月,中位生存时间15.3个月,1年生存率72.7%。两组疗效比较有统计学意义,P=0.035,两组毒副反应比较,均无统计学意义,P>0.05。结论:晚期非小细胞肺癌热化疗疗效优于单纯化疗。Objective: Objective: To study the efficacy of deep hyperthemia combined with chemotherapy for advanced non- small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods: Sixty-five pathologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC patients( Ⅲ or Ⅳstage) who were not fit for operation were divided into 2 groups randomly: deep hyperthemia combined with chemotherapy group( 33 cases) and chemotherapy group (32 cases) . The efficacy and side effects Were compared between these two groups. Results: For the chemotherapy group, the total effective rate( CR + PR) was 37.50% (12/32), the median time to disease progression(TTP) was 6.5 months,the median survival time was 9.5 months and the 1-year survival rate was 53, 6%. For the deep hyperthemia combined with chemotherapy group, the total effective rate( CR + PR) was 63.70% (21/33), TTP was 9.6 months,the median survival time was 15.3 months and the 1 -year survival rate was 72.2%. There was significant difference in efficacy between these two groups ( P = 0. 035 ), but the side effects have no significant difference ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion : The efficacy of deep hyperthemia combined with chemotherapy on non- small-cell lung cancer is better than pure chemotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222