检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张胜[1]
出 处:《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年第6期95-100,共6页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
摘 要:中外民事诉讼制度改革的路径存在较大差异:西方国家民事司法改革重点是推动案件管理、集中化审理,进而提高审判效率;我国的改革思路是推动审判流程管理、审判质效管理来通过管理法官进而提高审判效率。通过比较及实证研究,我国的改革应彻底去除行政化的影响,加强法官案件管理权与集中化审理。Civil judicial reforms in western countries focus on promoting case management campaign and the concentration of adjudication, thus to improve judicial efficiency through the procedural managements of judicial caseflow and intensive trial, while the path of judicial reform in China is to implement trial process management, and to establish assessment system of trials' quality, so as to improve judicial efficiency through the control of case management in the way of managing the judges. Through comparative and empirical studies, it is concluded that the judicial reform in China should focus on completely eliminating the administrative influence, and promoting the judges' power in managing cases and the concentration of adjudication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143