检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:兰跃军[1]
出 处:《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第6期115-120,共6页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:自诉担当作为国家公权力协助被害人私权利的一种基本形式,对于保障被害人自诉权的有效行使,正确处理国家公诉权与被害人自诉权的关系,以实现刑事自诉制度的宗旨具有重要价值。俄罗斯及我国台湾地区刑诉法都明确规定了这一制度。我国增设这一制度具有充分的理论和实践根据,应当借鉴域外的先进做法,构建适合我国国情的自诉担当制度,加强自诉案件被害人人权保障。Private prosecution assumes one kind of basic form assisting the victim private interests right as public authority of a country, exercises to effectively ensure the private prosecution right of victims, rightly handles the relation between national right of prosecution and the private prosecution right of victims, which has important value to realize criminal private prosecution system. Russia and Taiwan Region clearly stipulate this lawful system. It has full reason and theoretical and practical basis for China to add this system. China should learn the outside advanced method to construct China' s private prosection undertaking system suitable for China' s reality and to protect private procecution right of the victims and to reinforce the case of private charge victim human rights guarantee.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56