检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王立志[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省政法管理干部学院,河南郑州450002
出 处:《新疆财经大学学报》2009年第4期66-70,74,共6页Journal of Xinjiang University of Finance & Economics
基 金:2009年河南省政府决策研究招标课题<个人信息的刑法保护>(编号B125)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:隐私权是现代社会最重要的新兴基本人权之一,英国是普通法系的代表性国家,但长期以来英国法律不承认独立的隐私权,因此造成英国隐私权法律制度发展严重滞后。英国在隐私权刑法保护方面不但条文稀少,且相对零散,难以对隐私法益形成有效保护。但英国隐私权刑法保护并非一无是处,英国刑法独特的责任制度和刑罚制度在对隐私权刑法保护中别具一格,值得予以高度评价和特别关注。The right of privacy is one of the most important basic human rights emerging in modern society. The Great Britain England is the representative country of the ordinary legal system. Its law does not acknowledge the independent right of privacy, therefore, its legal system of right of privacy developed poorly for a long time. The scarce and relatively scattered article protection by criminal law of right of privacy can form the effective protection to the privacy. There still exist some merits in protection to privacy by criminal law in the Great Britain. We should place high evaluation and special attention to the unique responsibility system and the penalty system in protection to privacy by criminal law in the Great Britain which appears a distinctive style.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157