检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院口腔颌面外科,副主任医师北京100853
出 处:《中华老年口腔医学杂志》2009年第5期272-275,共4页Chinese Journal of Geriatric Dentistry
摘 要:目的:在腮腺上份肿物的区域性腺体切除术中,采用改良耳屏切口,行肿物及周围腺体切除,并与常规切口比较,评价治疗效果。方法:腮腺上份肿物患者32例,随机分为两组,第一组应用改良耳屏切口,第二组采用常规耳前颌后"S"形切口,进行肿物及区域性腺体切除术,解剖并保留相关的面神经分支。术后比较两组患者组织反应程度、面神经功能、Frey综合征、肿瘤复发率、面部美观、病人满意度,综合评价治疗效果。结果:改良耳屏切口组术后渗出少,局部肿胀轻,疤痕隐蔽,Frey综合征发生率低,病人满意率高,上述指标均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。两组患者肿瘤复发率、面神经功能障碍、涎瘘发生率无明显差别(P>0.05)。结论:改良耳屏切口创伤小,并发症低于传统术式,疤痕隐蔽,术后颜面美容效果理想。Objective: To analyze clinically two methods of incision in patients who had undergone regional parotidectomy for improving cosmetic results. Methods: There were 32 cases of parotid gland tumor in the patients, those divided into two groups randomly. All patients were performed partly parotidectomy with intra-antilobium incision in group one and routine "S" -shape incision in group two respectively. Follow-up was carried out from 1week to 2years post operation to observe the treatment result. Results: There were less tissue reaction, less time of recovery, less scar and more beautiful outlook and more satiafaction in group one than those in group two (P0.05) . There was no difference on relapse rate and incidence of partial facial nerve injury among two groups (P0.05) . Conclusion: The trauma and some post complications were reduced in the new technique. This surgical approach presented could achieve a better facial cosmetic result in the parotid gland surgery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117