检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕强声[1] 王亚东[2] 程辉[1] 陆峰[1] 高远东[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省滨海县人民医院普外科,224500 [2]阜宁县人民医院普外科
出 处:《肿瘤研究与临床》2009年第12期813-814,817,共3页Cancer Research and Clinic
摘 要:目的观察肝动脉灌注化疗对胃癌肝转移的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2003年1月至2009年1月收治的胃癌肝转移患者31例的临床资料,全部患者均施行相对胃癌根治术,治疗组17例,术中置肝动脉化疗泵,术后行肝动脉灌注化疗;对照组14例,术后行全身静脉化疗。结果随访时间为4~57个月,治疗组近期有效率为88.3%(15/17),1、2、3年生存率分别为88.2%、62.7%、28.9%,未出现需要特殊治疗的不良反应;而对照组近期有效率为28.6%(4/14),1、2、3年生存率分别为68.1%、38.9%、13.0%,化疗不良反应重,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=12.87、P〈0.05,χ^2=5.511,P〈0.01)。结论肝动脉灌注化疗治疗胃癌肝转移的方法有效,不良反应轻,优于全身静脉化疗。Objective To study the effect and value of hepatoarterical catheter chemotherapy in treating gastric carcinoma with liver metastasis. Methods A total of 31 cases of gastric carcinoma with liver metastasis undergoing radical operation were preoperatively randomly divided into 2 groups: Regional infusion chemotherapy (treatment group, 17 cases) and peripheral venous chemotherapy (control group, 14 cases). Results The short-term effectiveness of the treatment group was 88.3 %(15/17). The survival rates of 1, 2, 3 year were 88.2 %, 62.7 %, 28.9 %, respectively. However, the short-term effectiveness of the control group was 28.6 %(4/14). The survival rates of 1, 2, 3 year were 68.1%, 38.9 %, 13.0 %, respectively. There was obvious difference between the two groups (χ^2= 12.87, P 〈0.05;χ^2 =5.511, P〈0.01). Conclusion Hepatoarterical catheter chemotherapy is effective for gastric carcinoma with liver metastasis undergoing radical operation and has less toxic side effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117