检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张志勇[1] 王莉[2] 王鹏[3] 李天平[1] 江云鸥[3] 李幼平[2]
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西医院药剂科,成都610041 [2]四川大学华西医院中国循证医学中心,成都610041 [3]四川大学华西药学院,成都610041
出 处:《中国循证医学杂志》2009年第12期1281-1284,共4页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
摘 要:目的了解四川省公立医院药房领导力现状,为提高公立医院药房管理水平提供证据与建议。方法依据领导力理论和研究方法,设计问卷调查表,调查74家公立医院药房的管理者及骨干306人对公立医院药房领导力的认识。用率和构成比进行统计学描述。结果①接受调查者近70%认为领导不能独立决策、执行力一般、领导力风格是民主型;②近60%认为公立医院药房领导不能有效沟通,65%认为领导服务意识一般;③近70%认为领导处理日常事务能力一般;④领导者没有明显优势和劣势;⑤约50%对领导的信任逐步增强,50%对领导的信任没有变化或逐步下降。结论应对公立医院药房充分授权,提高决策能力、影响力、感召力和执行力,并转换领导力风格。Objective To investigate the current leadership status of public hospital pharmacies, and to provide evidence and suggestions for further improving the performance of public hospital pharmacies. Methods According to our conception of the key characteristics of leadership, we designed a questionnaire to investigate leadership practices among 306 managers and pharmacists working in 74 public hospital pharmacies. We used percentage and proportion for statistical description. Results (1) Over 70% of participants thought that public pharmacies lacked independent decisiveness; power was distributed; and elections were democratic. (2) Nearly 60% thought that public pharmacies lacked effective communication and awareness of service. (3) Nearly 70% thought that leader's abilities were not exceptional. (4)There were not obvious advantages or disadvantages among the leaders. (5) Half trusted the leaders and thought there should be no change. Conclusion Public hospitals should grant more power to pharmacies to implement effective leadership.
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249