检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈云[1] 刘根焰[2] 姚堃[1] 徐洁洁[3] 卢士强[1] 程冉[4] 梁志超[4] 崔屹[5]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学微生物免疫学系,江苏南京210029 [2]南京医科大学第一附属医院检验科,江苏南京210029 [3]南京医科大学第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉科,江苏南京210029 [4]江苏省肿瘤医院检验科,江苏南京210009 [5]中国药科大学生命科学与技术学院,江苏南京210009
出 处:《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》2009年第12期1638-1642,共5页Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助(30571715,30901750);江苏省实验诊断学重点实验室基金(XK200731);江苏省人事厅六大人才高峰资助(07-B-037)
摘 要:目的:评价EB病毒特异性VCA-IgA和EA-IgA抗体定量检测对EB病毒相关的鼻咽癌的诊断意义。方法:试验组为228例鼻咽癌血清标本,对照组为102例正常健康体检者血清标本。用ELISA法定量检测血清标本中EBV特异性VCA-IgA和EA-IgA抗体水平,以临床病理诊断为金标准,分析各血清检测指标的准确性、灵敏性、特异性及其cut-off值的设定。结果:正常健康人血清中EB病毒特异性VCA-IgA和EA-IgA抗体的平均水平分别为15U/ml和11.5U/ml,鼻咽癌患者血清中VCA-IgA和EA-IgA抗体的平均水平分别为56.5U/ml和63.5U/ml,鼻咽癌组抗体水平显著高于健康体检组。根据VCA-IgA、EA-IgA定量检测结果绘制ROC曲线图,曲线下面积分别为0.903和0.948,VCA-IgA、EA-IgA定量检测可用于鼻咽癌的准确诊断。根据ROC曲线图分析,cut-off值分别设定为30U/ml和23U/ml。按此值设定时,VCA-IgA检测鼻咽癌的敏感性和特异性分别为84.9%和66.8%,EA-IgA检测鼻咽癌的敏感性和特异性分别为87.9%和91.1%。联合检测VCA-IgA和EA-IgA的敏感性为92%,特异性为91%。结论:以ELISA法定量检测VCA-IgA、EA-IgA的血清抗体水平对鼻咽癌具有诊断意义,尤其将两指标联合应用。Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative assay of EB virus specific antibodies to VCA-IgA and EA-IgA on diagnosing and screening of EB virus related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods:The test panel consisted of 228 sera from NPC patients and 102 sera of healthy controls. For each specimen,immunoglobulin A antibodies to EBV-specific VCA(viral capsid antigen) and EA(early antigen) were quantitatively tested with enzyme linked immune absorbed assay respectively. Compared with the clinical pathologic diagnosis,the accuracy,sensitivity,specificity and cut-off value of each biomarker were analyzed. Results: The mean value of EB virus specific VCA-IgA and EA-IgA antibodies were 15 U/ mL and 11.5 U/ ml among healthy population;56.5 U/ ml and 63.5 U/ ml among NPC patients,each one’s level was significant higher in NPC patients than that in healthy population. VCA-IgA and EA-IgA can be used in diagnosing NPC accurately with 0.903 and 0.948,area under the ROC curve respectively. Through ROC curve analysis,the best cut-off values of VCA-IgA and EA-IgA were 30 U/mL and 23 U/ml. At this level,the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing NPC were 84.9% and 66.8% for VCA-IgA,87.9% and 91.1% for EA-IgA,and 92% and 91% for combined determination. Conclusion:Quantitative detection of VCA-IgA and EA-IgA antibodies with ELISA method is very valuable in diagnosing NPC,especially combined determination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222