检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]合肥工业大学管理学院,合肥230009 [2]合肥工业大学数学系,合肥230009 [3]华南理工大学工商管理学院,广州510641
出 处:《系统管理学报》2009年第6期649-654,共6页Journal of Systems & Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70771034);新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-05-0557);高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者2005年专项资金资助项目(200565);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20060359007)
摘 要:研究了非一体化供应链下单供应商-单零售商的库存运输联合优化问题,考虑了一体化的理想情况以及运输成本分别由供应商、零售商承担3种情况,并建立了数学模型。随机数据实验验证了零售商承担运输成本情形可获得较优的供应链整体利润,其值接近于理想情况下供应链的总体利润,进而采用利润分配策略,以确保供应商和零售商双方均能获得更大利润,从而促进供应链协调。数值算例和参数灵敏度分析验证了运输成本由零售商承担策略的优越性和稳定性。This paper deals with the inventory and transportation integrated optimization problem in a decentralized supply chain of one supplier and one retailer. Three scenarios of inventory and transportationintegrated optimization (ideal centralized supply chain, transportation cost paid by supplier and transportation cost paid by retailer) are discussed and modeled. Random numeric experiments demonstrate that moresupply chain profit can be obtained when retailer pays transportation cost and the profit of supply chain is very close to the profit in ideal centralized supply chain. In order to attract retailer to agree to pay trans-portation cost, profit division strategy is adopted to make sure both supplier and retailer obtain more profit. Numeric example and flexible analysis show the superiority and stability of the strategy of retailer paying transportation cost.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7