德国民事间接执行制度研究——兼论民事间接执行补充性理论  

On the Civil Indirect Enforcement System of Germany

作　　者：孔令章[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学 [2]西南政法大学,河北保定071003

出　　处：《河北法学》2010年第1期173-178,共6页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：2009年度国家社会科学基金项目<民事间接执行比较研究>(09BFX081)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：德国民事诉讼制度对民事间接执行的适用范围与实施程序做了严格的规定,强调对债务人宪法上自由权、平等权和正当程序的保障,并形成了"一请求权一执行方法"和"间接执行补充性"的理论原则。但随着人权保障内容的更新,执行理念的转变,间接执行的适用范围得到了扩张。法院应根据适切原则、损害最小原则及均衡原则裁量选择执行方法,针对个别具体执行事件的特性需要,选用一种或并用二种执行方法为最适切执行。There are some strict provisions for the applicable ranges and the implementing procedures on civil indirect enforcement in the Germany civil procedure. The system of the civil indirect enforcement emphasizes the freedom, equity right and due process protected by the Constitution and establishes the principle of ＂one-claim, one-enforcement method＂and the theory of ＂supplemental indirect enforcement＂. However, with the renewal of human rights guarantee matters and the change of the enforcement idea, the applicable range is expanded. The court should select its enforcement method in accordance with the principle of appropriation, the principle of causing the least damages, and the principle of interests balance and consider the feature and requirement of each specific case to select either of both methds to implement the most appropriate enforcement.

关 键 词：间接执行 一请求权一执行方法 间接执行补充性理论 适切执行 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学] D997.9[政治法律—法学]