西方经济学要素价值论的哲学悖论  

A Philosophical Paradox in Factor Value Theory in Western Economics

作　　者：程晓[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西高等学校社会科学学报》2009年第12期61-63,共3页Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi

摘　　要：西方经济学把价值混同于使用价值,从货币出发去理解价值,把生产要素当作价值的源泉,形成了要素价值论。就价值的源泉而言,马克思的劳动价值理论是更科学和客观的。在西方经济学中,劳动和资本仅仅成了生产要素,这不仅消解了人在社会历史发展中的主体地位,而且也导致西方经济学内部对资本定义的莫衷一是。马克思的劳动价值论避免了要素价值论的缺陷。Value,in western economics,is confused with use value since it is interpreted from the angle of currency and thought to derive from essential factors of production, thus establishing the theory of factor value. But with regard to the source of value, Marx＇ theory of labour value proves to be more scientific and objective. In western economics, labour and capital have become nothing but essential factors of production ; this not only weakens the dominant position of people in the development of history and society, but results in an ambiguity about the concept of capital in the study of economics. Marx＇theory of labour value, instead, avoids the defects of factor value theory.

关 键 词：西方经济学 要素价值论 悖论 

分 类 号：F0[经济管理—政治经济学] B018[哲学宗教—哲学理论]