检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京军区福州总医院医务部,福州350025 [2]福建医科大学公共卫生学院卫生管理与社会医学系
出 处:《华南国防医学杂志》2009年第6期60-62,65,共4页Military Medical Journal of South China
基 金:福建省重点课题(2006R0053)
摘 要:目的探讨四种预测福建省卫生人力及床位的方法,比较各自优缺点。方法应用趋势外推法、人力人口比值法、医院规划模式法和灰色动态模型预测法4种方法预测卫生人力及床位情况并对结果进行比较。结果预测2005年的卫生人力及床位时,4种方法所得结果的相对误差分别为:2.53%,0.45%,0.48%,1.40%;8.54%,1.51%,0.45%,0.35%。结论在对福建省床位进行预测时,灰色动态模型预测法最优;在对卫生人力进行预测时,人力人口比值法最优。政府在确定合理科学的卫生人力和床位时,应根据实际情况,选择合理的预测方法。Objective To investigate four forecasting methods of medical human and bed resources in Fujian and compare their advantages and disadvantages. Methods The medical human and bed resources were predicted by trend extrapolation, human population ratio method, the hospital planning model law and the gray dynamic model prediction re spectively, and the results were compared. Results By predicting medical human and bed resources in 2005, the relative error of the results obtained by four methods were 2. 53%, 0. 45%, 0. 48%, 1. 4004 and 8.54%, 1.51%, 0. 45%, 0. 35%. Conclusion In the medical bed resource prediction, the gray dynamic model prediction is optimal; in the medical human resource prediction, human population ratio method is optimal. The government should choose the right prediction method to determine reasonable medical human and bed resources.
关 键 词:卫生人力 床位 趋势外推法 人力人口比值法 医院规划模式法 灰色动态模型预测法
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249