检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨景玉[1] 高琳琳[1] 胡颖新[1] 张养菊[2]
机构地区:[1]山东省寄生虫病防治研究所/山东省消化系统疾病防治中心,山东省济宁市272033 [2]山东省济宁医学院附属医院
出 处:《中国全科医学》2010年第1期83-85,共3页Chinese General Practice
摘 要:目的探讨基于消化性溃疡临床路径的健康教育方法及其实施效果。方法将160例消化性溃疡患者随机分为试验组和对照组,各80例,试验组采用基于临床路径的程序化健康教育模式,对照组采用常规诊疗护理模式。结果出院时,试验组患者对疾病知识掌握程度、对医疗护理满意度与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的平均住院日、治愈率比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用基于临床路径的健康教育模式更有利于消化性溃疡患者的照护与康复。Objective To investigate health education methods and result of peptic ulcer based on clinical pathway. Methods Totally 160 peptic ulcer patients were randomly divided into Trial group and control group, with 80 in each. The patients in the trial group were given programmed health education model based on clinical pathway, and those in the control group were given conventional medicine model. Results On the time of discharge, the health knowledge mastering degree and satisfaction with medical care of the patients in the trial group were significantly better than those in the control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The differences in average length of hospitalization and curing rate between the two groups were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Application of health education model based on clinical pathway is more conducive to care and healing of patients with peptic ulcer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117