检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院
出 处:《数量经济技术经济研究》2010年第1期44-57,共14页Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金"和谐社会的微观基础"(编号:07BJY017);国家社会科学基金"中国产业结构转换路径选择与城乡就业统筹"(编号:09CJY005)的资助
摘 要:本文利用DEA三阶段法对1999~2006年我国东中西部农村资金投入与农村区域间居民收入差异进行了分析。研究表明,东中部农村资金投入效率较高,西部综合效率明显低于东中部且为无效,地区间效率的差异以及累计效应的影响在一定程度上导致了农民区域间收入的不断扩大。东中部农民收入差距更多体现在资金投入总量上,而西部却受到投入不足与效率低下的双重约束。与此同时,全国以及三大区域的各项效率均不存在明显的收敛特征。Using three-stage DEA model, this paper investigates the discrepancy with respect to investment income in China's east, middle and west areas during the period of 1999-2006. It is concluded that the efficiency is higher in eastern and middle rural areas, and is lower in western rural area. The discrepancy and accumulative effect with respect to investment income in China's east, middle and west areas lead to increasing enlargement of income gap in rural areas. In middle area, agricultural income gap exhibits itself as the difference of capital investment, while in western area agricultural income gap is limited by both insufficient investment and low efficiency. In addition, there was not obvious convergence of the technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.241.63