检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2010年第1期69-81,共13页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:教育部2006年人文社会科学基金项目"实质的刑法解释论研究"(项目号06JC820016)阶段性成果
摘 要:类型思维是概念思维呈现没落态势时的基本法学思维方式,具有价值导向性、介于抽象与具体之间的中间性、使法规范与生活现实相互调适的开放性等特点。在刑法立法上,类型化应是我国将来的刑事立法发展方向;在刑法适用中,合理解释犯罪构成要件、准确形成案件事实都离不开类型思维。类型思维引入刑法领域,标志着刑法学摒弃主客体分离而采用主客体并存的认识模式,意味着刑法解释立场由形式解释论、主观解释论向实质解释论、客观解释论的革新,并带来了对禁止类推解释原则的深思。Typological thinking is a basic legal thinking pattern while the conceptual thinking declines, which boasts of the nature of value orientation, staying in the middle of the abstract and concrete, the openness mutually adjusted by legal norms and the realities,and etc. In criminal legislation, typification should be the direction of crim- inal legislation development in the future. In the application of criminal law, the reasonable explanation of criminal constitutive requirements and the determination of the case facts all need typological thinking. The introduce of ty pological thinking in criminal law marks the criminal law's abandonment of the separation of the subject with the object and its acceptance of the cognition mode of the coexistence of the subject and the object, which means the innovation from formal interpretation and the subjective interpretation theories to substantive interpretation and objective interpretation theories, and also invokes further consideration of the principle of banning typological interpretation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222