走出中国法学学派发展的三个误区——关于反对“本质主义”与邓正来先生商榷  

Step off Several Erroneous Areas That China Law School Develops

作　　者：费小兵[1] 文正邦[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《学术界》2010年第1期91-98,共8页Academics

基　　金：文正邦主持的国家社会科学基金项目<马克思主义法哲学与中国法制建设和法学发展研究>(批准号06XFX003)

摘　　要：邓正来先生认为中国法学(及其学派思潮)发展应反对"本质主义"。我们并不完全赞同,而认为存在阻碍中国法学学派发展的三个思维误区:以"本质主义"为名的窒息创造,以"非本质主义"为名的向恶演化,以及真问题簇的缺失。中国法律理想图景的"本质主义"在实践中应以"非本质主义"的样态展现出来,即以法学的多元"学派",以学术路径的不同展现出同一个方向:追求理想的生活目标。Deng Zhenglai thinks that the development of China’s Law and its schools and thoughts should oppose'essentialism'.I’m not completely for it,I think there are three erroneous areas which hinder the development of china law school,namely,the suffocated creation under the guise of essentialism,the worsening tendency in the name of non-essentialism and the absence of real problem .the essentialism of the ideal prospect of China’s Law school in its practice unfold the non-essential form,namely,on the basis of pluralistic school of law,to unfold in the same direction with different academic paths:to pursue the goal of ideal life.

关 键 词：法学学派 本质主义 非本质主义 真问题 法律理想图景 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论] B089[政治法律—法学]