历史认识主体研究之缘起与定义之纷争(下)——新时期历史认识论研究学案之一  

The Debates on the Causes and Definition for Research on Subjectivity from Historical Epistemology(Ⅱ)——An Academic Case of Historical Epistemology Research in the New Era

作　　者：周祥森[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学世界历史研究所,河南开封475001

出　　处：《苏州科技学院学报（社会科学版）》2010年第1期77-86,共10页Journal of University of Science and Technology of Suzhou:Social Science

摘　　要：历史认识主体研究是新时期中国历史认识论研究的突破点,也是历史认识论研究的重点、核心所在。在新时期以来30年的历史认识主体研究中,历史学者们对这一研究之兴起的内缘、外缘因素的认识,基本上是相近的,差别只在于认识是否全面和侧重点不同而已。但是,在历史认识主体概念的内涵和外延界定上,却存在着较大的意见分歧和严重的混乱现象。一个突出的表现是,不少学者不同程度上混淆了概念的前提和命题之间的关系,把历史认识论范畴中的历史认识主体混同于其他语境里的主体。如何科学地界定历史认识主体的内涵和划分它的层次(外延),仍然是一个需要深入探讨的问题。The study on the subjectivity of historical cognition is an indispensable and important branch of historical epistemology in China＇s new period of reform and opening up. In the past 30 years, during the process of studying on this perspective, historians generally agree with the connotation and denotation of the origination of the subjectivity in historical category, the difference lies in the completeness and emphasis towards the problem; the confusions mainly come from mistakenly defining the connotation and denotation on the subjectivity of historical cognition. One striking point is that to a certain extent, many scholars confuse the relationship between presupposition and supposition to be more accurately, they confuse the subjectivity of historical category with the subjectivity in other categories. Therefore, how to scientifically define the division of the connotation and denotation of the subjectivity of historical cognition remains an important issue.

关 键 词：历史认识论 历史认识主体 历史认识主体形式 存在形态 

分 类 号：K01[历史地理—历史学]