两种方法拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床对比研究  

Clinical comparison of two methods for extracting impacted mandible wisdom tooth

作　　者：杨志峰[1] 李海霞[1] 刘宪国[1] 姜圣洋[1] 王国义[1] 

机构地区：[1]聊城市第二人民医院口腔科,山东聊城252600

出　　处：《中国美容医学》2010年第1期100-101,共2页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine

摘　　要：目的:高速涡轮牙钻法和劈冠凿骨法拔除下颌阻生智齿的疗效对比。方法:采用高速涡轮牙钻法拔除下颌阻生智齿120例,同期采用劈冠凿骨法拔除下颌阻生智齿的患者中,随机抽取120例作为对照,所有病例术后第3天复诊,对比观察临床反应。结果:高速涡轮牙钻组的手术时间、张口受限程度、干槽症的发病率与劈冠凿骨组均存在显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:高速涡轮牙钻在下颌阻生智齿拔除中与传统手法相比,有手术时间短,减轻肿胀、张口受限,减少干槽症发生的优点,是值得推荐的方法。Objective To compare the clinical effects for the treatment of impacted mandible wisdom tooth by the high-speed turbine tooth drill or cleaving crown and chiseling bone method. Methods 120 cases released bone and crown resistance by the high-speed turbine tooth drill, other 120 cases by the cleaving crown and chiseling bone. All the patients were observed the clinical reaction 3 day after treatment. Results The data showed that duration of extraction ,degree of clinical poor reaction and incidence of dry socket had significant differences in two groups （P〈 0.01）. Conclusion Compared to the traditional method in the extraction of the impacted mandible wisdom tooth, the high-speed turbine tooth drill had many advantages with short mean operation time, lighten swelling and limitation of mouth opening and reduction incidence of dry socket.

关 键 词：高速涡轮牙钻 下颌阻生智齿 拔牙术 

分 类 号：R783[医药卫生—口腔医学]