计算训练法与间歇训练法的比较研究  

Comparison between Computerized Running Training Program and Intermission Training Method

作　　者：王凯[1] 赵康健[1] 

机构地区：[1]集美大学体育学院,福建厦门361021

出　　处：《体育科学研究》2010年第1期97-99,共3页Sports Science Research

摘　　要：为提高训练质量从而获得良好的运动效果以及促进计算训练法的普及与发展,运用文献资料法、比较分析法对计算训练法和间歇训练法进行对比分析。研究认为:准确掌握运动员负荷因素之间的相互关系及其内在规律是在间歇训练法和计算训练法运用过程中的核心内容。间歇训练法主要是通过教练员的实际经验控制训练负荷;计算训练法在间歇训练法的基础上得到发展,利用计算机和系统工程理论制定的速度表有效的提高训练的科学性,但同时应该辅以教练员的实际经验。In order to improve training quality and develop computerized running training program, this paper employed literature review and comparative analysis to study and analyze computerized running training program and intermission training method. The study shows that mastering the loads interrelation and internal regularity is the key to grasping the intermission training method and computerized running training program. Intermission training method depends on the trainers＇ experience to control loads while computerized nmning training program, as a developing result of intermission training method, relies on both the computer and systematic engineering theory and trainers＇ experinee to control load,which is more scientific.

关 键 词：计算训练法 间歇训练法 负荷 

分 类 号：G808.1[文化科学—体育训练]