思想史的界定与门径——以两部学案为例  

Definition and Approach to the History of Thought——Take Cases of Ming Ru Xue An and Song Yuan Xue An for Examples

作　　者：何俊[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学宋学研究中心,杭州310028 [2]复旦大学文史研究院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2010年第1期15-20,14,共7页Zhejiang Social Sciences

摘　　要：由于研究对象的无形与复杂,思想史的界定很困难。虽然思想史的研究应该是一个开放的领域,但具体的研究却有待于来自学术史的规定。《明儒学案》与《宋元学案》是中国思想史研究中的奠基性著作,本文以这两部学案为例,就思想史的形态与内容、体例与方法,以及知识与价值诉求下的不同的思想史观进行了分析。It is hard to define the history of thought since the subject is invisible and complicated.Although the study of the history of thought should be open,the concrete study of which needs regulations of the intellectual history.Ming Ru Xue An and Song Yuan Xue An,the two foundation books in the study of Chinese history of thought are taken as examples in this article,in which the pattern and content,style and method of the history of thought,and different ideas about the history of thought under the impact of pursuit of knowledge and value are discussed.

关 键 词：思想史 形态 内容 体例 方法 思想史观 

分 类 号：C092[社会学]