我国民事审前程序改革的反思和解围——从功能比较方法论的角度  

Civil Pretrial procedure Reform,Reflection and Rescue——From the Perspective of Functional Comparison

作　　者：徐菁[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学法学院,浙江杭州310000

出　　处：《大庆师范学院学报》2010年第1期70-74,共5页Journal of Daqing Normal University

摘　　要：我国的民事审前程序改革已进行多年,学界也对此进行了大量研究,但对审前程序的基本概念却尚未形成统一的认识,在论证方向上,无论是支持还是批判,都带有一种"扎堆"和走极端的侧向;在借鉴域外制度的研究方法上,始终走不出规范比较的局限,由此形成的改革方案大同小异。针对以上问题,在界定审前程序含义的基础上,主要对现在民事审前程序改革中的几个趋向进行反思,认为我国现在不宜移植当事人主义的民事审前程序,而应使用功能比较的方法,着眼于不同制度的同质性,着力改良审前调解程序,充分发挥老制度的新价值,以期与当事人主义审前程序殊途同归。The reform of civil pretrial procedure have been carried on for years, and scholars have done substantial research on this, but consensus about the concept of pretrial procedures has not been reached yet, and all the argument tend to he concentrative and extreme, regardless of support or criticism; when talking about the research methodology, we always cannot get rid of the limitations of normative comparison, as a result, the reform program more or less the same. In view of the above questions, this paper firstly defines the meaning of pretrial procedure, and then reflects on some trends of the civil pretrial procedure reform, which demonstrates that now our country should not transplant adversary-system Civil pretrial procedure, and the method of functional comparison should be used, which focus on the homogeneity of different systems. As a conclusion, we should make efforts to improve the preparatory mediation, and give full play to the new value of the old system, hope that it will achieve the same effect as adversary-system pretrial procedure.

关 键 词：民事审前程序 概念 反思 功能比较 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]