检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:逄锦江[1] 赵传山[1] 朱青[1] 唐杰斌[1]
机构地区:[1]山东轻工业学院制浆造纸科学与技术教育部重点实验室,山东济南250353
出 处:《纸和造纸》2010年第2期27-30,共4页Paper and Paper Making
摘 要:PAE为活性高分子树脂,固含量越高稳定性越难控制。本文探讨一种固含量为35%PAE的制备工艺条件及与市售增强剂进行比较。实验证明选择胺酸摩尔比为1.05:1,聚酰胺预聚体催化剂的最佳用量为1.0%(对总量的摩尔比),反应温度为170℃左右,环氧氯丙烷与聚酰胺预聚体摩尔比为1.1:1,反应温度为60℃。环氧化反应后得到黏度为200~240mPa·s(涂-4杯50~60s)的聚酰胺树脂,干抗张强度优于市售PAE,湿抗张强度略低,PAE/CMC或PAE/CMS二元增强系统比单独使用PAE效果较优。PAE as an active polymer resin, the higher the solid content, the more difficult to control the stability of it. This paper discussed a solid content of 35% PAE of the preparation process conditions and with the commercially available strengthening agent for comparison. Results showed that the option of acid molar ratio was 1.05:1, polyamide prepolymer catalyst optimum dosage was 1.0% (molar ratio of the total), the reaction temperature was about 170 ℃, epichlorohydrin and the polyamide Prepolymer molar ratio was 1.1:1, the reaction temperature set at 60℃. Epoxidation obtained by the viscosity of 200-240mPa's (Tu 4 cups 50-60s) polyamide resin, dry tensile strength was superior to commercially available PAE, wet tensile strength was slightly lower, PAE / CMC, or PAE / CMS dual strengthening systems was better than PAE alone.
分 类 号:TS727.2[轻工技术与工程—制浆造纸工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.192.154