检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周燕娇[1] 吴维敏[1] 余书勇[1] 尹俊峰[1] 肖宁
机构地区:[1]海南省海口市解放军187中心医院普外科,海口571159 [2]海南省海口市海南军区医院特诊科,海口570260
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2010年第1期146-147,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:探讨乳腺癌改良根治术后伤口胸带包扎与传统弹力绷带包扎的临床效果。方法:将乳腺改良根治术后的病人60例按年龄,体质量、手术方式随机分为两组,每组30例,伤口置双管引流并胸带包扎的为A组,伤口置双管引流并传统弹力绷带包扎的为B组,分别记录其临床效果。将有关数据用统计学的方法进行比较。结果:两组在总引流量、拔管时间、疼痛时间和术后并发症上均有显著性差异,P<0.05。结论:对乳腺癌根治术后患者采用改良结构性胸带加压包扎法,可减少并发症的发生,促进切口愈合,缩短住院时间。Objective:To study the clinical effects of dressing with chest bandage and Common elastic bandages after modified radical mastectomy operation of breast cancer. Methods:60 patients receiving breast cancer resection were randomly divided into two equal groups: the experimental group and the control group. In the observational group (B groups), the patients received two-tube drainage but dressing with Common elastic bandages and in the latter (A groups)they received two-tube drainage but dressing with chest bandage. The clinical effects were recorded and the data were statistically compared. Results:We Found significant differences in terms of total drainage amount, time for tube withdrawal duration of pains and postoperative complications (P〈0. o5). Conclusion:Dressing with chest bandage after modified radical mastectomy operation of breast cancer can reduce postoperative complication, accelerate healing of wound and shorten the time of hospitalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222