论行政行为概念的确立意义——以韩国的学术讨论为中心兼论我国的行政行为概念移植问题  

The Definition of Administrative Action and Its Significance——Centered on the academic arguments in Korea and the concept transplantation in China

作　　者：吴东镐[1] 

机构地区：[1]延边大学法学院,吉林延吉133002

出　　处：《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第1期137-144,共8页Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：确立何种内涵的行政行为概念,取决于对行政行为的"角色"定位、概念确立意义的认识。韩国学术界围绕行政行为概念的理解而展开的争论根源于法价值观的不同或对功能认识的差异。我国学术界在移植行政行为概念的过程中没有解决好概念的功能定位问题。因此,在学术上应当还原行政行为的传统概念,将行政行为概念作为理论建设的工具,完全从实定法功能中解放出来,让其专注于理论体系的构筑。而在实定法上另设新的概念,让其专注于诉讼功能。How to define the connotation of administrative action is subject to the understanding of its role play and the significance of definition making. Arguments about the definition of administrative action among Korean scholars originate from different values of law and various explanations of its functions. It must be admitted that the function of definition making has not been correctly understood when China＇ s scholars transplanted the definition of administrative action. Therefore, it is necessary to restore the traditional definition of administrative action and separate it from positive laws so as to utilize it as a tool of theory construction. Meanwhile, positive laws should be defined again accordingly to make it concentrate on the function of lawsuits.

关 键 词：行政行为概念 由来 功能定位 移植 

分 类 号：D915.4[政治法律—诉讼法学] D912.1[政治法律—法学]