俄罗斯罪过理论的几个问题  

Issues on Russian Theory of offence

作　　者：薛瑞麟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《求是学刊》2010年第1期87-93,共7页Seeking Truth

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目"思考与反思:俄罗斯犯罪构成理论研究";项目编号:08JA820043

摘　　要：俄罗斯的现行罪过理论与德国的罪责规范论同是对罪责心理论的否定之否定,即在新基础上的再生,但否定的思路各不相同。俄罗斯没有走近罪责规范论是多种因素的合力致成的,其中最主要的是它遵循的世界观和方法论与德国有别。罪过与犯罪的主观方面均系行为人与行为、结果的心理联系,在内容上两者是否重合,关键要看刑法上的规定。不能断言定势理论是揭示无认识过失犯罪的心理内容的最佳理论,但它至少为我们解读这种心理内容提供了心理学上的根据。Russian Current theory of offence and German offence regulation are the negation of the negation of psychology of offence, that is, it is the rebirth based on new foundation with different negative train of thought. Russia does not adopt offence regulation due to many factors, among which different world outlook and methodology from German counterpart are the most important. The subjective aspect of offence and crime are the psychological connection between the agent and behavior and consequence. Whether they overlap in content or not lies in the rules in criminal laws. It can not be confirmed that set theory is the best one in revealing the psychological content of not recognizing offence, but it at least provides us with psychological basis to interpret this psychological content.

关 键 词：罪过 罪责规范论 定势 

分 类 号：DD914[政治法律—法学] D951.2