检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乔欣[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《河北法学》2010年第3期42-47,共6页Hebei Law Science
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目基金资助<民事纠纷的多元化解决机制与构建和谐社会的理论与实证研究>(08JJD820174)阶段性成果
摘 要:损害公司利益的不正当关联交易是以公司法为代表的一系列实体法所规制的对象,提起关联交易纠纷之诉解决关联交易纠纷,是救济公司和股东因不正当关联交易所受利益损害的重要途径。公司法首次明确了关联关系的概念和关联方对公司的损害赔偿责任,这是研究关联交易纠纷之诉的基础。以此为基点,结合实体法和程序法理论,对关联交易纠纷之诉提起的基础理论和审判实务问题进行探讨,在关联交易纠纷可诉性前提下,阐述当事人诉权的依据,并对相应诉讼提起形态与法院裁量进行分析。The illegitimate related party transaction is the object regulated by the substantive laws. Bringing a related party transaction lawsuit is the major way to relieve the interests of the company and the shareholders. The concept of the incidence relation and the compensation responsibilities of the affiliated parties, provided clearly by the company law for the first time, are the basis for this research. Further, the paper integrates the substantive law with the procedural law, and discusses the fundamental theory of the action and the judicial practice. Presuming that the related party transaction action possessed the litigable nature, the paper elaborates the foundation for the party's litigious right, and analyses the corresponding form of action and the court's discretionary right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198