我国刑法立法解释立场的实证考察  

A Positive Study on the Stand of Legislative Interpretation of Criminal Law in China

作　　者：苏彩霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2010年第2期174-186,共13页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BFX063);教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目(06JC820016)

摘　　要：在刑法解释的立场上,存在着形式的解释论与实质的解释论之争。对我国当前九个刑法立法解释进行实证考察后发现,我国刑法立法解释均采取了实质的解释立场。这一立场具有两个积极功能:合理入罪,促进刑法的规范正义;适当出罪,实质地保障人权。这一实质的解释立场值得继续坚持与维护。There is a debate between the formal and substantive theories regarding the interpretation and application of criminal law. This positive study on the nine documents of the legislative interpretation of criminal law shows that the Chinese legislative interpretation of criminal law adopts a substantive interpretation. The substantive interpretation has two beneficial functions： to improve criminal justice through reasonable criminalization; and to substantially protect human rights through reasonable non-criminalization.

关 键 词：刑法立法解释 形式的刑法解释论 实质的刑法解释论 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学] F832.3[政治法律—法学]