检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟晓艳[1] 李春花[2] 魏红[3] 王大华[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京100875 [2]北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习研究所,北京100875 [3]北京师范大学高等教育研究所,北京100875
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2010年第2期197-204,共8页Psychological Development and Education
基 金:教育部一般人文社科基金(青年)(08JCXLX002);国家自然科学基金(青年)(30500160)
摘 要:为编制适用于老年人的夫妻依恋测量问卷,将18份常用的成人依恋问卷的题目作为最初的项目来源,经过预试初步筛选得到85个项目。对434名60~88岁的社区老年人进行施测,并对施测结果进行项目分析和探索性因素分析,初步形成《老年人夫妻依恋问卷》。该问卷包含18个项目,分属于安全、焦虑和拒绝三个维度。该问卷具有良好的信度和效度,可用于测量城市社区老年人的夫妻依恋状况。运用《老年人夫妻依恋问卷》对样本的依恋模式进行考察,发现老年人夫妻依恋模式的分布特点表现为:安全型依恋模式的人数比例最高,其次是焦虑型依恋,最少是拒绝型依恋。To develop a questionnaire measuring the marital attachment style for older people, items from 18 existent and widely used questionnaires were collected together as the item source. After the initial screening by pilot study, 85 items were identified as the primary items of the questionnaire. And then 434 older people aged from 60 to 88 years old completed this 85-item measurement. Among the participants, 222 were male and 212 were female. With item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, 18 items were identified as good representative of the questionnaire. Factory analysis indicated that the final 18 - item scale comprised three sub - scales, namely security, anxiety and avoidance. The reliability and validity were examined respectively and showed that the questionnaire had satisfactory psychometric features. The distribution of attachment style among older adults was explored tentatively with the sample. With discriminative analysis, all the participants could be categorized into three types of attachment styles, i.e. secure attachment with the highest ratio, anxious attachment and refusal attachment with the lowest ratio.
分 类 号:B844.3[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145