检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《特区经济》2010年第2期108-109,共2页Special Zone Economy
基 金:国家大学生创新性实验计划项目(和谐社会背景下的多元化纠纷解决机制建构;项目编号:081005420)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:我国证券市场自上世纪90年代建立以来,发展迅速,为国民经济发展做出了重要贡献。随着证券市场的壮大,大量的证券纠纷亦亟待解决。但长期以来,我国证券纠纷的解决方式主要为证券诉讼,人民法院成为解决证券纠纷的主要场所,更适合解决证券纠纷的证券仲裁制度在理论界和实务界都未得到足够重视。基于此,本文拟对造成此种现象的原因进行分析,并提出完善和发展我国证券仲裁制度的相关建议。Since its establishment from the Nineties of the Twentieth Century, the security market in our country developed quickly, which has contributed a lot for the economic development. With the continuous grandness of security market, security disputes follow on in large numbers. However, for a long time, the main settlement way of security disputes in our country is security litigation and the main place to settle it is People’s court. The securities arbitration agreement which is more suitable for it does not arouse enough attention in the theory and the practice circle. This paper therefore analyzes the reasons for this phenomenon and makes some suggestion on the perfection and development of the securities arbitration agreement in our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3