中文版尼古丁依赖检测量表信度和效度的初步研究  

Psychometric property of Chinese version of the Fagerstrom Test of Nicotine Dependence

作　　者：潘珏[1] 金文婷[1] 王晓丹[1] 白春学[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海复旦大学附属中山医院呼吸科,200032

出　　处：《国际呼吸杂志》2010年第5期266-269,共4页International Journal of Respiration

摘　　要：目的评估中文版尼古丁依赖检测量表在中国尼古丁依赖者中的信度和效度。方法收集2008年11月至2009年7月于中山医院吸烟及其相关疾病门诊就诊相关个人信息例如年龄、性别、吸烟时间、每日吸烟量、有无戒烟史等，并完成尼古丁依赖检测量表。随机抽取样本60例，并对尼古丁依赖检测量表进行信度和效度进行统计。结果本研究克隆巴赫a系数=0．658，与国外许多研究相一致，但低于理想的0．7。量表中各项目并未能覆盖DSM—IV中对物质依赖以及尼古丁戒断的重要诊断标准，缺乏内容效度，通过因子分析提取得两个因子，两个因子方差的累积贡献率为58．767％。结论中文版尼古丁检测量表是一份信度和效度可自我测评量表，但仍需作进一步修改以更能在中国戒烟治疗和科研上发挥更大作用。Objective The aim of this study is to estimate the psychometric psychometric of the Chinese version of the Fagerstrom Test of Nicotine Dependence（FTND） in Chinese people. Methods Collected information of outpatients who went to the outpatient service for advices and assistants of smoking cessation in Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital From November 2008 to July 2009. Then randomly select the sample of 60 participants and estimated the reliability and validity of FTND. Results The Cronbach＇s a coefficient was 0. 658, cocurrent with reliability coefficients of foreign studies, but did not meet the satisfactory standard of 0.70. The six items of FTND could not cover main elements of diagnostic criteria of substance dependence and nicotine with drawal in DSM-IV,lacked content validity. There were two components with eigenvalues 〉1 ,with accounted totally 58. 767% of the total Variance in this scale, which indicated that it is multi factor influenced. Conclusions The Chinese version of FTND is a fairly reliable and valid scale, but still needs to be revised to accommodate coss-cultural differences to play a more important role in smoking cessation therapies and scientific studies in China.

关 键 词：尼古丁依赖检测量表 中文版 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R749.6[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]