检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州市疾病预防控制中心,浙江杭州310021
出 处:《中国健康教育》2010年第3期196-199,共4页Chinese Journal of Health Education
摘 要:目的探讨婴儿期养育方式对青少年期综合心理健康状况及其相关方面的影响。方法采用一般情况问卷(自拟)、青少年自评量表(YSR)、青少年生活事件自评量表(ASLEC)对66名婴儿期采用隔代养育的青少年(研究组)和67名婴儿期采用亲子养育的青少年(对照组)进行测评。结果多元方差分析显示,两种养育方式的青少年综合心理健康无差异,(Wilks’λ=0.881,F=1.85,P=0.066>0.05);控制了婴儿期主要养育人受教育年限和生活事件混杂因素影响后进行多元协方差分析,结果显示亲子养育青少年社交方面优于隔代养育青少年(2.54±0.24vs3.44±0.25,F=6.38,P=0.013<0.05)。结论养育方式对青少年综合心理健康的远期影响有限,应当加强隔代养育儿童社交方面的培养。Objective To explore the effects of infant rearing practices on mental health of adolescents.Methods This study was carried out to compare mental health outcomes,using Youth Self-Report(YSR) between adolescents raised by their grandparents(study group) and adolescents raised by their parents(control group) in infant period.Results Multivariate ANOVA showed that no significant differences in general mental health were found among the adolescents of different infant rearing practices(Wilks'λ=0.881,F=1.85,P=0.066〉0.05).Multivariate Analysis of Covariance(MANCOVA) was used to control the effects of live events stress and Average Education Years of main foster.The subsequent analyses showed that the two groups showed no significant difference except for social problems(2.54±0.24 vs 3.44±0.25,F=6.38,P=0.013〈0.05).Conclusion The long-term effect of infant rearing practices on adolescent mental health was limited,but grandparents should pay more attention to helping their grandchildren developing social skills.
分 类 号:R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] B844.1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145