检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室,北京100088
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2010年第2期41-44,共4页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(06JA820044)
摘 要:《侵权责任法·医疗损害责任》立法,是医疗损害赔偿案件法律适用由二元向一元转归的标志,但是在立法的基本理念和具体问题的处理上仍然存在很多缺陷。医疗损害赔偿是一种特殊的民事赔偿,不应完全照搬一般民事侵权赔偿,此次立法没有体现该理念,更没有体现医疗损害限额限项赔偿制度。立法中以过错责任为原则,过错推定为例外的归责原则,没有将医疗行为及我国医疗行业的特殊性体现出来,严重过错作为医疗损害责任构成的首要条件更为合理。而且免除医疗机构赔偿的情形规定得也不充分,医疗责任保险作为医疗损害赔偿的基础,在立法中也没有体现。The legislation of medical damage liability in Tort Liability Law is a symbol of trasforming legal application of medical damage compensation from dualization to unification. However, there are several defects in the basic idea of the legislation and in the treatment of practice specific issues. The compensation of medical damage is a special civil compensation, not similar to general civil compensation, and the legislation doesn't express the idea and the system of limiting the quantity and scope. The principle that the liability of fault is the principle and the presumption of fault is an exception doesn't reflect the particularity of the medical conduct and medical industry. Gross negligence should be the primary condition of liability for medical damages. Besides, the situations that exempt the medical institutions from compensation are not sufficient. Medical malpractice insurance, as the base of compensation of medical damage, isn't expressed in the legislation either.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249