保障医疗纠纷第三方调解机制中立性的伦理思考  

Ethical Reflection on Protecting the Neutrality of a Third-Party in Medical Dispute Mediation Mechanism

作　　者：张泽洪[1] 

机构地区：[1]温州医学院人文与管理学院,浙江温州325035

出　　处：《中国医学伦理学》2010年第1期114-115,132,共3页Chinese Medical Ethics

基　　金：温州市2009年第二期科技计划软科学项目;项目编号:R20090081;项目名称:温州市医疗纠纷第三方调解机制的构建

摘　　要：医疗纠纷第三方调解机制本身具有的中立性不会自动实现,从伦理角度看,保障其中立性须从三方面入手:其一,走出医疗纠纷第三方调解中立的伦理误区:走出个人情感偏私的伦理误区,解决对纠纷事实偏见的伦理误区;其二,遵循医疗纠纷第三方调解中立的伦理原则:回避原则、对抗原则、调解公开原则;其三,实施医疗纠纷第三方调解中立的伦理对策:调解独立于行政,调解独立于媒体,调解人员独立于调解机构,调解人员异地选拔,调解人员的身份保障,调解人员惩戒制度,调解人员同医院的适度阻隔。First,the neutrality of a third-party mediation in resolving medical disputes can not be automatically achieved.Ethically analyzed,the protection of the neutrality of a third-party mediation can be conducted from the following three steps,including going beyond the ethical error of personal emotional bias,following the ethical principles of avoidance principle,the adversarial principle,and openness mediation principle,and carrying out the countermeasures of being independent from administrative institutions,public media,conciliation officer independent of the intermediary,remote selection of mediators,mediation officers as security personnel disciplinary system for mediation,conciliation of officers with moderate barriers to the hospital.

关 键 词：医疗纠纷 第三方 中立 

分 类 号：R-052[医药卫生]