库恩与科恩科学革命观的比较研究  

Comparative Study of Kuhn and Cohen's Concept of Scientific Revolution

作　　者：苏玉娟[1,2] 魏屹东[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心,山西太原030006 [2]山西省委党校现代科技教研部,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第2期8-13,共6页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：山西省留学基金项目"科学概念变化机制与规律研究"(0505502)

摘　　要：库恩和科恩作为历史主义学派的代表人物,分别提出了各自的科学革命理论。这两种理论在研究目的、评价标准、适用范围及语境因素分析上有所不同,但他们研究的问题具有相似性,如"改宗"现象、教科书的历史地位、科学家心理因素的分析等。两者都表现出适用范围上的局限性,都带有主观主义和相对主义的倾向。As the representatives of the historical school, Kuhn and Cohen respectively put forward their own theory of scientific revolution. These two theories not only differed in the purpose of the study, evaluation criteria, the application of the context and analysis of different factors, but also resembled in the object of the study, such as the ＂conversion＂, the historical status of history textbooks, scientists＇ psychological factors. The two revolutionary theories both reflected the limitations of the application scope with the tendency of subjectivity and relativism.

关 键 词：库恩 科恩 科学革命观 

分 类 号：B151[哲学宗教—世界哲学]