“周虽旧邦,其命惟新”——对“当代中国哲学”何以作为问题的思考  

"Although Zhou was an ancient state,it had a reform mission"——Thinking about how Contemporary Chinese Philosophy can Be a Problem

作　　者：张蓬[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西省社会科学院人文杂志社,陕西西安710065

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第2期21-28,共8页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：当下学界多有建构"当代中国哲学"之呼吁,亦有为此之诸种努力,但"中国哲学"作为哲学既有语境中的合法性疑问,亦有学科语境界限不甚清晰的无奈。由此,"当代中国哲学"如何成为了问题,为了什么而"建构","建构"之可能与如何,皆需理论上的抉择与取舍。这里的抉择取舍既离不开对于中国传统哲学精神特质的把握与接续,更离不开由此说开去的开新和建构。无论是把握和接续,还是开新和建构,从何说起,从谁说起,是首先要抉择的问题。从本土语境作为问题的始点出发,"当代中国哲学"作为问题的意义,来自于对本土哲学存在状态、特质的梳理与把握,更离不开对于当代诸哲学先贤之"接着讲"的承继,依此似乎可以为"当代中国哲学"作为问题找到言说的起点,即从何说起与从谁说起。Appeals and attempts to construct ＂Contemporary Chinese Philosophy＂ are prevailing in philosophy circle nowadays, if ‘ Chinese Philosophy＇ is regarded as philosophy, we will question on the validity and ambiguous limits of its contexts. Therefore, problems as ‘ how Contemporary Chinese Philosophy＇ can be a problem ; for what it is ‘ constructed ＇ ; what ＇ s the possibility of its ‘ construction＇ and how to ‘ construct＇ are trade-offs in theory. Without holding and keeping on the ethos of Chinese traditional philosophy, without opening up and constructing on the basis of the former, it is impossible to make choices. Then, the first thing is to find answers to the question ‘ from where and with whom we should begin＇. If taking domestic context as the beginning, the significance of considering ＂Chinese Philosophy＂ as a problem comes from reviewing and grasping of the existing condition and characteristics of local philosophy, and especially inheriting ＇＂ going on speaking＂ from the present sages. Hereby, we find the answers and the starting point of saying for regarding ＂Contemporary Chinese Philosophy＂ as a problem.

关 键 词：当代中国哲学 文化身份 政治依附性 

分 类 号：B26[哲学宗教—中国哲学]