检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余清臣[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学教育基本理论研究院,北京100875
出 处:《教育理论与实践》2010年第2期36-39,共4页Theory and Practice of Education
基 金:教育部长江学者资助项目"社会转型时期的中小学价值教育"(主持人为石中英教授)的研究成果之一
摘 要:从价值上考察我国当代师生交往制度是提升师生交往质量的必要环节。通过分析发现,我国现行师生交往制度的核心价值事实上是广义的平等,既包括"人格平等",又包括"师生的平等参与"。但是,这与师生交往应该具有的教育性这一核心价值还有差距,让我国师生交往制度回归教育性是解决这一问题的必然选择。我国师生交往制度回归教育性就是要:以"促进学生发展"的教育性代替平等成为师生交往的核心价值追求;强化教师在师生交往中的领导者和组织者地位和责任;赋予教师在师生交往中的合法行为自主权。A value examination of the contemporary teacher-student communication system in China is an essential step to improve the quality of teacher-student communication. The results show that the core value of teacher-student communication is the equality in its broad sense, which includes the equality of human dignity and the equal participation of teachers and students. However, it is still different from the core value of education teacher-student communication should bear. It is the inevitable choice to solve this problem for us to return the nature of education to the teacher-student communication. To pursue this, equality should be replaced by improving students’ development as the core value, the role and duty of teachers as the leader and organizer should be emphasized and teachers should be empowered to act independently and legally in the teacher-student communication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.202.40