检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董丽娜[1] 崔伯瑜[2] 牛田华[1] 张学云[1] 王文娟[3]
机构地区:[1]潍坊医学院,山东潍坊261042 [2]潍坊市人民医院 [3]河北医科大学
出 处:《临床口腔医学杂志》2010年第1期31-33,共3页Journal of Clinical Stomatology
摘 要:目的:观察GuttaFlow充填系统充填根管的临床疗效。方法:将急、慢性根尖周炎或急、慢性牙髓炎患者的120个患牙,随机分成两组。根管预备后分别用氧化锌丁香油糊剂加牙胶尖的冷侧压法(对照组)或GuttaFlow充填技术加牙胶尖(实验组)进行根管充填。根充后即刻拍X线牙片评价根充效果,术后1周及半年评价其临床疗效。结果:两组病例根充后X线显示充填效果有统计学差异(P<0.05),随访半年的临床成功率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:GuttaFlow充填系统是一种高效、简便的根管充填技术,但是远期疗效还有待于进一步观察。Objective: To evaluate the clinical effect of a recently developed root canal filling with GuttaFlow. Method: one hundred and twenty teeth with acute and chronic/ periapical disease/ acute and chronic puplpitis were randomly divid-ed into 2 groups (n=60). The root canals were instrumented and obturated with cold laterally compacted gutta-percha and zinc-oxide eugend sealer (group1) and with GuttaFlow technique (group2). The patients were recalled and observed after 7 days to 6 months. Result: There were significant differences of radiography between the 2 groups. After 6 months were no significant differences between GuttaFlow and cold laterally compacted techniques. Conclusion: GuttaFlow technique showed a similar clinical effect to cold laterally compacted technique and can be acceptable for root canal filling, but the long term clinical result is needed to be investigated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28