论国际刑事法院管辖权补充性原则——以达尔富尔问题为例  

On Supplemental Principle by International Criminal Court Jurisdiction——Take Daerfuer Question as Example

作　　者：宋丽弘[1] 史秀娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古民族大学政法与历史学院,内蒙古通辽028043

出　　处：《内蒙古民族大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第1期86-90,共5页Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University：Social Sciences

摘　　要：国际刑事法院是人类社会第一个长期的独立的国际刑事司法机构,尽管其管辖的罪行只有四种,但其管辖权的行使仍然难免与国家司法主权发生法律冲突。因此,尊重国家司法主权和维护国际法律秩序就成为了国际刑事法院的历史使命。为此,国际刑事法院将其管辖权的行使定位在补充性这一前提之上。本文结合国际刑事法院对达尔富尔问题的管辖事例,阐述了国际刑事管辖权的发展及国际刑事法院管辖权补充性原则的创立和具体表现,并就管辖权补充性原则在实践中如何应用提出了自己见解,同时也对国际刑事法院对达尔富尔问题的管辖是否具有法理支撑明确了自己的观点。The International criminal court is the human society first long - term independence international criminal justice organization, although its jurisdiction crime only then four kinds, but its jurisdiction exercised still unavoidably had the legal conflict with the rational judicature sovereignty. Therefore, the respect country judicature sovereignty and the maintenance international law order has become the International criminal court historical mission. Therefore, the International criminal court exercises its jurisdiction locates above supplemen- tal this premise. This article unifies the International criminal court to the Daerfuer question jurisdiction instance, elaborated the international criminal jurisdiction＇s development and the International criminal court juris-diction supplemental prineiple＇s establishment and the concrete manifestation, how and did apply in reality on the jurisdiction supplemental principle proposed oneself opinion, simultaneously also to International criminal court to Daerfuer question jurisdiction whether to have the legal principle theory of law support to be clear about own viewpoint.

关 键 词：达尔富尔 国际刑事管辖权 国际刑事法院管辖权 补充性原则 

分 类 号：D741.2[政治法律—政治学]