论基本权利保障的技术方案——基于数学思维的分析框架  

Technological Plan for Protecting Fundamental Rights:A Deducing Framework based on Mathematics Thought

作　　者：欧爱民[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《法制与社会发展》2010年第2期36-49,共14页Law and Social Development

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"中国宪法事例分析的类型化研究"(09BFX016)

摘　　要：理论界与实务界在基本权利保障领域侧重于定性分析,但"主观性过大、确定性不够"的流弊在所难免,容易陷入"仁者见仁智者见智"的困境。为了增加基本权利保障的确定性与预测性,采用定量分析法,运用数学思维建构一个操作可行的技术方案势在必行。其主要思路为:首先,在传统三重审查基准的基础上,创立六重审查基准,亦即明显审查基准、合理审查基准、严格合理审查基准、中度审查基准、严格审查基准与绝对审查基准;其次,建立案件类型与违宪审查基准之间的联动机制。该机制的主要内容是厘清具体案件所包含的保障因子;根据保障因子的保障分值,计算出具体案件的保障量数;按照保障量数的大小,选择适用的审查基准,并据此对之进行宪法检验。The analysis of rights in theoretical and practice circle emphasized on quality and thus controversies always rise and conclusions rely more on subjective factors. It is desirable to adopt quantitative analysis with a practical technological plan to assure the certainty and anticipation. The approach could be： first, establish a six - layer reviewing benchmark including obvious reviewing benchmark, reasonable reviewing benchmark, strictly reasonable reviewing benchmark, middle reviewing benchmark, strict reviewing benchmark, and absolute reviewing benchmark. Second, set up an interactive mechanism in case patterns and reviewing benchmark the contents of which are collect factors of protection within a case, calculate the measures of protection based on the marks of protection on factors, and choose applicable reviewing benchmark according to measures of protection and make a constitutional test by this.

关 键 词：数学思维 保障因子 保障量数 六重审查基准 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]