制度伦理学:新学理典范的创制及其实践介入性品格——现代社会“道德人”理想诉求何以可能的否思  

Institutional Ethics: Establishment of the Model of New Theory and its Intervening Quality of Practice——A Negative Reflection on the Reasons for the Ideal Demand of the "Moral Man" in Modern Society

作　　者：袁祖社[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学政治经济学院,陕西西安710062

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第2期63-71,共9页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(03BZX015);2006年教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"资助项目(NCET-05-0860)

摘　　要：伦理观念是特定历史文化传统与制度组织中,相对自足的人性"社会化规训"的自我设计、自我实现方式。伦理学思想史中充满着对道德观念是否具有一致性和连续性的相对主义和怀疑论性质的追问。当代制度伦理学的兴起,一开始就表现出直面伦理困境、勇于范式变革的创制性实践品质和智慧。在制度伦理学的视域内,现代道德叙述所包含的问题与"他向性"的认同密切相关。道德生活不再是"自向性"的,而是社会制度规范及其纪律(规训)的一种形式,换言之,道德叙述本身成为一种知识的政治。道德不再是个人的内在要求,不是个人生存中自我雕琢自我的那个维度,而是一种秩序方式。Ethical perception is the means of self-design and self-actualization in specific histo-cultural traditions and institutional organizations against ＂socializing discipline＂ of self-sufficient human character. The rising institutional ethics in contemporary days presents the quality and intelligence to bravely face ethical dilemma and boldly practice transforming and introducing new patterns. In terms of institutional ethics, issues involved in mod- em moral narration are closely related with the identification of ＂other-orientation＂. From this perceptive, morals are no longer ＂self-orientating＂, but a form of the norm of social institution and discipline. In other words, moral narration becomes an intellectual politics itself. Morals are no longer personal internal demand, nor a dimension to portray oneself in personal existence, but a means of social order.

关 键 词：制度伦理学 道德人 自向性 他向性 

分 类 号：D621[政治法律—政治学]