机构地区:[1]吉林大学病理生物学教育部重点实验室,长春130021 [2]吉林大学第一临床医院
出 处:《中华病理学杂志》2010年第3期187-191,共5页Chinese Journal of Pathology
基 金:基金项目:教育部高校优秀青年教师奖励计划(2000134);吉林省科技发展计划项目(200705369);吉林省卫生厅重点实验室科研项目
摘 要:目的观察RNA干扰(RNAi)体外培养的HeLa细胞端粒酶催化亚单位(hTERT)对HeLa细胞生物学行为的影响,进一步探讨端粒酶活性与肿瘤细胞恶性生物学行为的相关性。方法体外转录法设计合成4条针对hTERT基因的shRNA,脂质体转染HeLa细胞后经免疫荧光染色和端粒重复序列扩增一酶联免疫法(TRAP—ELISA)测定端粒酶活性,筛选出端粒酶沉默效果最佳片段即B链shRNA。以B链shRNA转染HeI。a细胞为实验组,转染无关siRNA的HeLa细胞为对照组,显微镜下观察细胞在纤维黏连蛋白(FN)上的铺展;CCK一8细胞计数试剂盒检测细胞在FN上黏附;划痕实验评价细胞迁移;Boyden小室侵袭实验检测细胞侵袭能力。结果铺展实验显示细胞接种到FN上30min时,对照组铺展细胞的比率为(31.3±7.9)%,而实验组铺展细胞的比率仅为(5.6±2.3)%,两组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);2h后对照组和实验组铺展细胞的比率分别为(79.4±4.8)%和(26.3±6.1)%,两组差异仍有统计学意义(P〈0.01);24h后两组所有细胞几乎均呈铺展状态。细胞黏附实验显示细胞在FN上黏附30rain时对照组细胞黏附率为(83.7±5.4)%,而实验组的细胞黏附率为(67.2±2.8)%,明显低于对照组(P〈0.05)。划痕实验检测细胞的迁移能力显示实验组细胞24h迁移率为(27.1±6.2)%,明显低于对照组(58.7±15.0)%。Boyden小室侵袭实验显示在Matrigel胶上培养4h后,实验组和对照组侵袭的细胞数分别为75.7±14.5和165.1±11.0,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论降低体外培养HeLa细胞的端粒酶活性使细胞的生物学特性发生改变,表现为减低了HeLa细胞的恶性生物学行为。Objective To investigate the biology of HeLa cells upon inhibition of human telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT) gene by RNA interference in vitro. Methods Four shRNAs (A, B, C and D) targeting hTERT gene were designed and prepared by in-vitro transcription. The expression of hTERT gene was evaluated by immunofluorescent staining and telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) ELISA (TRAP-ELISA) , after transient transfection of shRNAs by lipid formulation. Through the initial selection, shRNA (B) was noticed as the most efficient one in down-regulating hTERT gene and therefore was chosen as the ultimate shRNA used in the experimental groups. Those transfected by non-silencing RNAi were chosen as the control groups. Cell spreading and migration were studied by microscopy and cell adhesion to fibronectin (FN) was assayed by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8). Cell invasion was assessed by Boyden chamber assay. Results Cell spreading study revealed that the rates of spreading cells in the experimental groups were (5.6 ± 2.3) % at 30 min, and (26. 3 ± 6. 1 ) % 2 h after the inoculation, respectively, whereas the rates of spreading cells in the control groups were (31.3 ±7.9)% and (79.4 ±4. 8)% , respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups(P 〈 0. 01 ). However, most of the cells in bothgroups became spreading after 24 h. Cell adhesion assay demonstrated that the rate of adhesion cells on FN in experimental groups was (67. 2 ± 2. 8 ) %, less than that in control groups ( 83.7 ± 5.4 ) % ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The relative migration distance was (27. 1 ± 6. 2) % in the experimental group, lower than that of the control group(58. 7 ± 15.0 )%. The invasion assay revealed that the invading cells were 75.7± 14. 5 in the experimental group, in contrast to 165. 1 ± 11.0 in the control group after 4 h incubation on matrigel. The difference between these two groups was significant (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion In vitro shRNA silenc
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...