检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘泉[1] 张紫英 覃燕玲[1] 周柳艳[1] 熊颖铭[1]
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第四附属医院口腔科,柳州545005 [2]柳州市第三人民医院口腔科,柳州545007
出 处:《口腔医学》2010年第3期161-163,共3页Stomatology
摘 要:目的观察手用镍钛根管器械ProTaper在后牙根管治疗中的效果。方法220例后牙根管治疗病例随机分为PT组(镍钛根管锉组)110例,392个根管,采用ProTaper手用镍钛锉冠根向深入法预备根管;KH组110例,397个根管,采用ISO标准型不锈钢K型锉和H型锉,冠根向深入法预备根管。比较2组根管预备时间、预备后疼痛发生率、根管充填恰填率。结果PT组在根管预备时间、根管预备后疼痛发生率上均低于KH组(P<0.05),根管充填恰填率高于KH组(P<0.05),差异有显著性。结论手用ProTaper能够保持根管初形、省时省力、安全,明显提高根充效果,值得推广。Objective To observe the effects of hand ProTaper NITI instrument in the root canal treatment. Methods 220 cases who needed root canal treatment were randomly divided into two groups. The root canals were prepared with hand ProTaper( PT group: 110 cases, 392 root canals, gradually forward method) and ISO standard stainless steel type K and H files( KH group: 110 patients, 397 root canals, gradually forward method) , respectively. The preparing time, pain after preparation and root canal obturation effection were evaluated. Results In root canal preparation time and incidence of pain, root canal obturation rate were significantly lower in PT gronp than in KH group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The difference was statistically significant. Conclusions The hand ProTaper instrument can maintain root canal form, save time, obviously improve the root obturation effection safely. It is worth popularizing.
关 键 词:根管治疗 ProTaper手用根管器械 不锈钢K H型锉
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200