3种“活动矫治器”基托材料热压处理前后性能比较  

Comparison of the properties of three denture base materials treated and untreated by hydraulic pressure cooker

作　　者：王勇[1] 葛鑫[1] 方军[1] 苏文强[1] 王小竞[1] 

机构地区：[1]第四军医大学口腔医学院儿童口腔科,西安710032

出　　处：《实用口腔医学杂志》2010年第2期149-152,共4页Journal of Practical Stomatology

基　　金：陕西省国际合作计划项目(编号:2008kw-22)

摘　　要：目的:比较咬合诱导"活动矫治器"3种基托材料的弯曲强度、冲击强度、粗糙度、弹性模量和色度,为临床选择材料提供依据。方法:以日进齿科材料有限公司生产的自然义齿基托聚合物Ⅱ型(以下简称日进)、日本株式会社而至生产的而至快速自凝基托树脂(以下简称而至)、上海二医张江生物材料有限公司生产的义齿基托树脂液Ⅱ型和上海医疗器械股份有限公司齿科材料厂生产的义齿基托树脂Ⅱ型(以下简称混合)3种基托材料为研究对象,对基托材料进行热压处理;测试挠曲强度、冲击强度、粗糙度及测试色度。测试结果用SPSS12.0软件进行方差分析和TamhaneT2检验。结果:同一材料的"加压处理组"和"未加压处理组"比较,所有材料冲击强度的改变均有统计学意义,除此以外,个别材料挠曲强度和色度的改变有统计学意义。对于不同材料同一性能的比较,冲击强度:而至>"混合">日进;挠曲强度:日进>"混合">而至;弹性模量:日进>"混合">而至;粗糙度:而至>日进>"混合"。结论:热压处理可以作为提高活动矫治器的基托性能的手段;3种材料比较,各有长短。医师应该结合治疗实际情况选择最合适的材料。Objective： To compare the properties of three kinds of denture base materials treated and untreated by hydraulic pressure cooker. Methods： The impact strength, flexural strength, flexural elastic modulus and color difference roughness of three denture base materials, Kunshan Rijin（ KR）, GC UNIFAST Trad（ GC）, Shanghai Zhangjiang（ SZ）, were measured in vitro. All results were statistically analyzed with SPSS software to have ANOVA and Tamhaneg T2 tests, α = 0.05. Results ： Comparison of the same materials between the treated materials and the untreated materials by hydraulic pressure cooker： there were significant statistical differences of impact strength for all the materials. There were significant statistical differences of color difference for KR and SZ. Comparison of the three materials ： impact strength, GC 〉 SZ 〉 KR ; flexural strength, KR 〉 SZ 〉 GC ; flexural elastic modulus, KR 〉 SZ 〉 GC ; roughness, GC 〉 KR 〉 SZ. Conclusion： The properties of denture base materials treated by hydraulic pressure cooker are good.

关 键 词：基托材料 挠曲强度 弹性模量 冲击强度 色度 粗糙度 

分 类 号：R783.1[医药卫生—口腔医学]