检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《天津体育学院学报》2010年第2期171-174,共4页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport
摘 要:使用目前最有效的强分离程序——匹配(内隐学习)和编辑(外显学习)研究范式,抽取大二普通系学生120名,采用3×2随机设计方差分析。探讨篮球战术决策获得过程中,内隐学习与外显学习的关系及情境复杂性对内隐学习与外显学习的影响效应。结果显示:在篮球战术决策获得过程中,内隐学习和外显学习及混合学习均显示出显著的绩效,并且内隐与外显学习相结合产生了促进、协同效应。在篮球战术决策获得过程中,内隐学习和外显学习与情境复杂性发现有交互作用,即在低复杂性情境下,内隐学习优于外显学习;高复杂性情境下,外显学习优于内隐学习。作为篮球战术决策研究指标最有效、可靠的是决策正确性和决策速度,决策自信心水平作为协变量在实验中没有影响篮球战术决策。At the present the most effective of the allocation form that the experiment adopted was force mating implicit learning and editing explicit learn- ing, 120 college students were selected as subjects. The experiment design is a random 3 ×2 variance. The relation between implicit and explicit learning and the effect of situation complexity on the gaining basketball tactics decision-making in the process of making decisions were examined. The results indicated that in the gains of basketball tactics decision-making, all the implicit learning, explicit learning and mixed learning had obvious effects. Implicit learning and explicit learning, when applied together, create promotional and combinative effects. In gaining basketball tactics gaining process, they are found mutual effective with complexity of situation, in less complicated situations, implicit learning is more effective than explicit one while in more complicated situations, things prove otherwise. Accuracy and speed are vital in decision-making in the basketball tactics evaluation process. Self-confidence level as covariable has no impact on score and speed in the experiment.
分 类 号:G804.8[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28