检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈光连[1]
出 处:《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2010年第2期28-32,共5页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目"以社会主义核心价值体系引领大学生思想道德教育研究"(09SJD710010)
摘 要:荀子既在人禽之别上肯定了人本质在善,又在人伦实践中分析了材性知能、仁义质具、人能思虑,看到了知性在道德教化中可以为善的潜能。虽然荀孟在人性论持不同的观点,但在德可教化的观念上是一致的。孟子向内发掘了人的德性本能,肯定了德性实践的主观能动性,从而为他的道德修养提供了前提条件;荀子向外扩展了人的德性能力,在知性的诉求中渗透了情感的因素和伦理的关切,道德教化的价值设计也有了坚实的根基。Xunzi not only consented the nature of people is good on the distinction between human and birds and beasts,but also saw the possibility of knowledge promotes good in moral education in analysis practice of pure nature and knowledge,kind and justice,and thinking ability of people.Although Xunzi and Mencius had a different point of view in the theory of human nature,they had the same point of view in the concept of virtue that man could be educated.Mencius explored the human virtues potential inward and affirmed the initiative of the moral practice,which provides preconditions of his moral self-cultivation.Xunzi expanded human virtue ability outward,which established a solid foundation for the possibility of moral education.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28