权利冲突的解决原则——以华硕名誉侵权案为例的法理分析  

Principles for the Settlement of Conflict of Rights——Legal Analysis Based on ASUS Defamation Case

作　　者：宋双[1] 徐倩[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学政法学院,吉林长春130117

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第2期20-23,共4页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：吉林省社会科学基金项目(2008Bfx12);东北师范大学校内青年基金项目(08QN006)

摘　　要：备受关注的华硕笔记本电脑案,在2008年以检察院对提出500万美元索赔要求的维权者黄静作出存疑不起诉决定而暂时落幕,同时也引起学界及民众对此案的关注和热议。2009年,黄静又向华硕提出了名誉侵权、消费欺诈两项诉讼。这将又是两起引起各界聚焦的个案,要想得出最佳的解决方案,需要裁判者进行多角度、深层次、综合性的思考与分析。笔者以法理分析为视角,以权利为切入点,对黄静诉华硕名誉侵权一案(以下简称华硕案)中所存在的权利冲突问题进行初步的分析探讨,以期对此案的司法实践及理论反思有所裨益。In 2008,the closely watched case of Asus notebooks ended temporarily.Procuratorate who had doubts about the decision was not to prosecute Huang Jing,one to raise five million U.S.dollars of claims of defenders.At the same time it also caused the education sector and the public concern over this case and hot discussion.In 2009,Huang Jing made to the Asus defamation,consumer fraud,two lawsuits.This would again focus on two cases by all walks of life.To get the best solution,referees needs a multi-angle,deep-level,comprehensive thinking and analysis.This paper from a theoretical law point of view,rights as an entry point,preliminarily analyses Huang Jing v.Asustek defamation case（Hereinafter referred to as ASUS Case） in which there is conflict of rights with the hope to make benefits in judicial practice and theoretical reflection.

关 键 词：权利冲突 解决 原则 法理分析 

分 类 号：F701[经济管理—产业经济]