从“隐喻意义”的流变看尼采和德里达的隐喻观  

Metaphorical Meanings Research from Nietzsche to Derrida

作　　者：单文博[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学,大连116026

出　　处：《外语学刊》2010年第2期41-44,共4页Foreign Language Research

摘　　要：虽然传统隐喻研究中的隐喻意义与非隐喻意义之分为隐喻研究抓住了问题的根本,但这也为研究隐喻的本质和工作机制的研究带来了束缚。在尼采和德里达的视野里,这种区分既非准确也非必要,因为在他们看来,从来就没有那种纯粹的隐喻意义和非隐喻意义,在话语的使用中人们所拥有的只是二者的"博弈"(interplay of the literal and nonliteral)。隐喻在尼采看来就是非"真实"的艺术想象力,而对德里达来说就是书写中的"印迹"。印迹的生命史又告诉我们隐喻的意义,即隐喻的本质以及认知机制则在于话语的运动中。Although the distinction between literal meaning and non-literal meaning has caught the hardcore of metaphor research problem. It has also brought some limitations for a breakthrough on the nature and its working mechanism of metaphor research. However under the poststructuralist perspective, the distinction is not crucial, as there is no such a thing as purely literal or non-literal meaning. What is at work in metaphor is an interplay of the two meanings （like ＂traces＂ in writing） in a discourse, which can be meaningful only in the context of movements of discourses.

关 键 词：隐喻意义 尼采 德里达 话语 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学]