慢性病病案管理模式对社区老年抑郁症疗效的影响  被引量:18

Effectiveness of case management of chronic disease for elderly depression in community

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吴海苏[1] 徐勇[1] 徐一峰[1] 朱惠仙[2] 朱丽萍[1] 薛晶晶[2] 王稼颖 

机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心,上海200030 [2]上海市徐家汇社区卫生服务中心,上海200030

出  处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2010年第4期245-249,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基  金:上海市预防精神医学重点学科建设子项目(05Ⅲ028-01);卫生部与世界卫生组织卫生技术合作项目(WP/2004/CHN/NCD/2.5/001/01.02.FE.01)

摘  要:目的:探讨慢性病病案管理模式对我国社区老年抑郁症患者疗效的影响。方法:采用随机对照研究方法,将年龄≥60岁,符合美国《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder,Fourthedition,DSM-Ⅳ)抑郁症诊断标准的120例老年抑郁症患者,随机分成干预组(N=60)和对照组(N=60)。干预组实行慢性病病案管理模式,即精神科医生、社区医生和病案管理员共同对老年抑郁症患者实施综合治疗方案,如健康教育、心理治疗和药物治疗等;对照组按照目前社区日常的医学方式进行。在治疗前,治疗第2、4、6、8、12周末分别应用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD-17)、临床疗效总评量表(ClinicalGlobalImpression,CGI)、治疗副反应量表(Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale,TESS)对两组患者的疗效和药物不良反应进行评定。结果:在治疗12周末,干预组患者HAMD-17总分[(14.19±7.66)vs.(24.93±5.86)]和CGI-GI评分[(1.61±0.92)vs.(3.43±1.42)]均低于对照组(均P<0.01);干预组有效率(83.1%vs.39.3%)、临床治愈率(27.1%vs.5.4%)高于对照组(均P<0.01);干预组患者坚持服药率高于对照组(98.3%vs.35%,P<0.01);两组患者药物不良反应轻微,且差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:应用慢性病病案管理模式可以有效地减轻抑郁症状,增加抗抑郁药的使用,提高治疗效果。Objective: To explore the effectiveness of case management of chronic disease for elderly depres- sion. Methods: Totally 120 elderly patients meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Fourth edition, ( DSM-IV ) criteria for major depression were enrolled in the study. All patients were randomly di- vided into intervention group ( N = 60 ) and control group C N = 60 ) . Intervention group patients received collaborative care provided by psychiatrists, primary care doctors and case managers, including health education, psycho- therapy and antidepressants. Control group patients were treated by usual medical model. The period of observation was 12 weeks. Effectiveness and safety were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Scale ( HAMD ), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) at baseline, at the end of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 12th week after treatment. Results: At the end of the 12th week after treatment, the HAMD-17 scores [ (14.19±7.66) vs. [24.93±5.86)] andCGI-Glscores[ (1.61±0.92) vs. (3.43±1.42)]ininter- vention group were significantly lower than those in control group (Ps 〈 0. 01 } . After 12 weeks, the rates of effectiveness 183. 1% vs. 39.3% ) and remission 127.1% vs. 5.4% ) in intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group ( Ps 〈 0.01 ) . There was significant difference in the rate of taking antidepressants (98. 3% vs. 35%, P 〈0. 01 ) between intervention group and control group. All adverse effects were mild in both groups and there was no statistical difference ( Ps 〉 0. 05 ) . Conclusion: The case management of chronic disease model appears to be effective to relief depressive symptoms, enhance antidepressants treatment copmlianee and im- prove the outcome.

关 键 词:社会精神病学 老年抑郁症 病案管理 慢性病 综合治疗 随机对照研究 

分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R197.323[医药卫生—临床医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象